On the Principle of Least Action
نویسنده
چکیده
If the question were who among the philosophers was the first to realize that nature in all its operations follows the easiest path, or what amounts to the same thing, expends the least amount of effort, it would surely be ridiculous to suppose that any one modern philosopher could lay claim to this glorious discovery. The earliest philosophers had already recognized that nature does nothing in vain and this relates perfectly to [the question of] least expense. For if nature were to employ superfluous expense, it would clearly involve nature doing something in vain. Aristotle already makes references to this doctrine, and it seems that he has taken this idea from those who preceded him rather than envisioning it himself. The proposition has subsequently had such enormous influence in the Schools that it was regarded as one of the first precepts of philosophy until Descartes ultimately dared to reject it. So when Mr. Koenig objects that Malebranche, s’Gravesande, Wolff, along with others, have said that nature always follows the easiest route, or uses the least amount of effort in its processes, not only do we agree, but we also acknowledge that he could have named even more. Also our Illustrious President never claimed that no one before him had thought of this law and has willingly relinquished this glory, such as it is, to those whom Mr. Koenig deems worthy of receiving it.
منابع مشابه
Radically Questioning the Principle of the Least Restrictive Alternative: A Reply to Nir Eyal; Comment on “Nudging by Shaming, Shaming by Nudging”
In his insightful editorial, Nir Eyal explores the connections between nudging and shaming. One upshot of his argument is that we should question the principle of the least restrictive alternative in public health and health policy. In this commentary, I maintain that Eyal’s argument undermines only a rather implausible version of the principle of the least restrictive alternative and I sketch ...
متن کاملارکان مسئولیت مدنی فیزیوتراپیست در نتیجه اتلاف
amongst professionals in medical practices the action of waste by physiotherapist is of importance to study. This is because unlike other medical practitioners, who may ultimately prescribe medicine and their responsibility is considered based on the principle of causation, physiotherapists are mostly working directly on the body of patients and their responsibility is governed by the principle...
متن کاملOwnership in Name, But not Necessarily in Action; Comment on “It’s About the Idea Hitting the Bull’s Eye”: How Aid Effectiveness Can Catalyse the Scale-up of Health Innovations”
A recently-published paper by Wickremasinghe et al assesses the scalability of pilot projects in three countries using the aid effectiveness agenda as an analytical framework. The authors report uneven progress and recommend applying aid effectiveness principles to improve the scalability of projects. This commentary focuses on one key principle of aid effectiveness – country ownership; it desc...
متن کاملThe Principle of Relativity: From Ungar’s Gyrolanguage for Physics to Weaving Computation in Mathematics
This paper extends the scope of algebraic computation based on a non standard $times$ to the more basic case of a non standard $+$, where standard means associative and commutative. Two physically meaningful examples of a non standard $+$ are provided by the observation of motion in Special Relativity, from either outside (3D) or inside (2D or more), We revisit the ``gyro''-theory ...
متن کاملFree Will and Moral Responsibility in Islamic Philosophy
According to a common view among Muslim philosophers, a moral agent has free will if and only if she is able to do an action when she wants to and is able to avoid it when she wants otherwise. Implicit in this view is the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP). On the other hand, according to this view, free will is dependent on requirements such as conception, judgement, tendency, decisi...
متن کاملBasic and legal analysis of the justification or non-justification of killing in defense of property
Justifying or not justifying killing in defense of property has always been a challenging issue for jurists Western jurists have studied such killing in the light of the principle of proportionalit. . That is,whether there is a balance and proportionality between defensive action - killing aggressor- and aggressive action - attacking property – or not. based on this principle, some believe that...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009